Rachel Reeves reportedly is to extend freeze hitting pensioners, benefits claimants and minumum wage earners, says new report

Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves is reportely going to extend an income tax threshold freeze (Image: Leon Neal, Getty Images)
Chancellor Rachel Reeves is reportedly mulling over the idea of freezing personal income tax thresholds in the upcoming Budget, a move that could have a significant impact on pensioners, minimum wage earners and benefit recipients. Successive governments have maintained these thresholds since 2021, resulting in millions being ensnared by ‘fiscal drag’, which means they’re paying significantly more tax.
The thresholds dictate the amount individuals can earn before they are taxed and currently stand at £12,570 for the lowest 20 per cent rate, £50,270 for the higher 40 per cent rate, and £125,140 for the 45 per cent rate. Fiscal drag refers to an increase in tax revenue for the government without a direct rise in tax rates, caused by wages and prices increasing with inflation while tax brackets and allowances remain static.
With the lowest rate frozen at £12,570, millions of the lowest paid workers are paying more tax due to overall price increases. This week, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer did not dismiss the possibility of freezing income tax thresholds in the forthcoming Budget.
The Prime Minister sidestepped numerous questions from Kemi Badenoch on this issue, which she claimed would violate Labour’s manifesto. The Chancellor is widely anticipated to hike taxes on November 26 to bridge a multibillion-pound shortfall in her spending plans.
It is predicted that Ms Reeves will freeze the income tax thresholds for an additional two years, extending the already announced freeze from 2028 to 2030.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies has unveiled in a newly published report highlightede the consequences of the ongoing freeze on income tax thresholds – particularly affecting the lowest-paid workers.
The study said: “In fiscal terms, the impact of threshold freezes has already been substantial. Freezes to the thresholds at which the basic (20%) and higher (40%) rates of income tax begin to apply are alone expected to raise £39 billion a year in 2029–30 (roughly similar to the amount of revenue that would be raised by increasing all rates of income tax by 31⁄2 percentage points).
“The threshold freezes mean that, all else equal, anyone paying income tax or NICs (National Insurance Contributions) will see their taxes increase. An additional impact of frozen thresholds is that a substantial minority of taxpayers will face higher marginal tax rates (for example, by going from being a basic-rate to a higher-rate income tax payer).”
Minimum wage workers
The IFS revealed that increases to the minimum wage were progressively being absorbed by workers being compelled to pay higher taxes.
The organisation stated: “More minimum wage workers are being brought into income tax – driven by both the tax freezes and substantial minimum wage increases. In 2015–16, just before the minimum wage started rising rapidly, a minimum wage worker would have needed to work 31 hours a week for a year to pay income tax.
“Should the Chancellor choose to continue the tax freezes for another two years, we estimate that figure would fall to just 18 hours by 2029–30 – the lowest level since the minimum wage was introduced in 1999. In other words, increasingly, even part-time minimum wage workers can expect to pay at least some income tax on their earnings.
“One consequence of this is to reduce how much of a minimum wage rise goes to workers, with more of the pay rise being recouped by the exchequer in the form of tax. A freeze extension would result in a full-time minimum wage worker paying £137 per year more in tax relative to current policy and £759 more than if there had been no freezes in the first place.”
State pensioners – 100 per cent to pay tax
For the first time, state pensioners who rely solely on this income are on the brink of facing income tax liability.
Next year’s increase is likely to keep it marginally beneath the £12,570 threshold – however, it is expected to surpass this figure by 2027.
The IFS stated: “For the first time since its introduction, the full new state pension is set to exceed the personal allowance in 2027–28. Since the state pension is taxable, this will require many more pensioners to pay income tax.
“Currently, the full new state pension is £11,973, meaning that pensioners with no other taxable income do not incur income tax. In 2022–23, just under half of those on the full new state pension were taxpayers. By 2027–28, that figure will be 100%. Unless the government grants an exemption, pensioners with low incomes will be required to begin paying tax directly to HMRC creating an additional administrative burden for millions of people.
“What is more, it is possible that many single pensioners who are in receipt only of the full state pension could become eligible for a small amount of pension credit (a means-tested benefit) because the tax payment will push their after-tax income below the pension credit threshold. Many other entitlements, including the free TV licence, are passported from pension credit, so this could both impose material administrative costs and be fiscally costly.
“It will also make future increases to the state pension less costly overall for the government and less beneficial to pensioners, since a larger fraction of state pension increases will be returned to the exchequer via higher tax. If the Chancellor chooses to extend the freezes, therefore, everyone in receipt of the full new state pension can expect to experience an increase in taxes.”
Individuals receiving benefits
The IFS has stated that the changes will also mean that those receiving benefits such as Universal Credit will increasingly be paying tax. The report clarified: “Since most means-tested benefits are by default uprated in line with inflation, individuals in households that receive means-tested benefits are increasingly likely to also pay income taxes. The number of taxpayers in families entitled to universal credit (UC) would rise to 3.1 million if the freezes are extended, 690,000 more than if there had been no freezes and 110,000 more than under current policy.”
The Treasury has declined to comment on speculation about what will be included in the Budget.


