OPINION: Immigration without integration doesn’t work and the government needs to understand that.

JJ Anisiobi calls for Britain to learn the lessons on immigration from Denmark (Image: Express)
Every time someone in the UK even mentions controlling immigration, a predictable chorus of demented lefties begin wailing about cruelty, compassion and how borders are apparently some kind of outdated concept. Which is why Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood travelling to Denmark to see how they’ve tackled the issue has sent certain people into absolute meltdown. But here’s the awkward truth, Denmark has managed to do something that Britain seems incapable of even attempting. They’ve brought asylum numbers under control.
By late 2025 the country recorded a historic 40-year low in asylum migration, with just 839 asylum requests approved. That didn’t happen by accident, and it certainly didn’t happen because the Danes suddenly turned into heartless villains. It happened because ordinary Danes started to feel that their culture was being eroded and that certain neighbourhoods were changing beyond recognition. Some areas had become majority non-Danish, and voters made it clear they wanted something done about it.
So their politicians listened. Benefits were reduced. Asylum stays were made temporary rather than permanent. Returns for those without a right to remain were made swift. New arrivals were expected to work and integrate rather than sit indefinitely in state-funded limbo. And perhaps most controversially, Denmark introduced laws targeting what they call “parallel societies”.
If more than 50% of residents in a vulnerable neighbourhood are non-Western immigrants or their descendants, that area can be designated a parallel society, triggering special policies aimed at restoring integration and balance. Predictably, activists howled at this, but the results speak for themselves.
My late grandmother, Grace, made Denmark her home. She did what millions of migrants throughout history have done – she integrated. She learned the language, adopted the customs and embraced the culture of the country she chose to live in. Those values were passed on to me and I see Denmark as a second home.
I’ve also seen first-hand how Denmark’s policies have changed places like Aarhus, where my grandmother lived. Areas that ten years ago felt run-down, graffiti-covered and frankly unwelcoming have been rejuvenated.
The parallel society policies didn’t destroy communities – they revived them. What Denmark demonstrates is something painfully obvious – immigration only works when integration works.
For years Britain’s political class has been terrified to say that out loud. We’ve been told that expecting newcomers to adapt is somehow offensive, that border control is mean-spirited and that cultural cohesion is a relic of the past.
The Danes ignored that woke nonsense, and the sky didn’t fall in. In fact, their society looks stronger for it. If Britain can implement even a fraction of Denmark’s success, the debate around immigration here might finally start to change, and ordinary Brits might once again feel that integration is not only possible, but expected.

